Your hardwareis better.
Better than the market leader's. The software you can buy for it is not.
Cody Studio is your project companion — a companion that builds. Your operational know-how becomes software, without you becoming a developer.
Manufacturing and technical companies, 20 to 150 staff. World-class expertise, no software department — and a script the business already depends on.
And others depend on it
As long as only you depend on it, it goes well. Once the business does, it doesn't.
You cannot buy it in
For the process your edge depends on, no program exists.
You decide on substance
What it has to do, you know. We build, you judge.
It stays yours
Switching costs you knowledge, not access.
Who this is not for
- No time and nothing of your own wanted: off-the-shelf software.
- You want to build it yourself: Claude Code or Cursor.
- You cannot name a business case: no partnership.
Better said now than after the invoice.
No agency, no consultancy: a machine, directed by a person. It builds, it runs, and it remembers.
You describe. Cody builds.
You explain the process the way you would to a new employee.
Production-ready, not demo-ready
Tests, access rules, a test result for every change. Built to ISO 27001 principles, not certified.
It stays in order
Every change is checked before it ships. What fails the check does not go live.
Everything stays yours
Your own code, your own database, your own AI access.
One sentence about the process that bothers you.
“The test-bench readings should belong to the batch, not to a spreadsheet.”
“I want to prove which parameters a part was made with.”
“Anyone should be able to run the sizing script, not just its author.”
“The production documentation is finished when the goods ship.”
Examples, not customer projects — we have no customers yet.
One conversation.One build plan.Years of operation.
Coding tools are good. They are just no longer there when someone asks, eighteen months on: why this way?
| Criterion | Cody Studiobuilds and stays | Coding toolper session | App builderclicking instead of coding | Agencypeople build it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How far does the memory reach? | Years, with reasons | One session | The project | As long as the team stays |
| Who runs it afterwards? | We do, continuously | You do | The vendor, as long as you pay | You or a separate contract |
| Who reports what comes from outside? | Rules, vendors, market | Nobody | Nobody | On request |
This describes what is usual. Individual vendors differ.
- Tie test-bench data to the batchDevelopmentImport built, mapping tested
- Production record per assemblyOperationsRunning for weeks untouched
- New field in the test reportDevelopmentWaiting for you
Example view. Items made up, form real.
No safety-critical systems: no engine control, no battery-management protection function, no machine control. Not out of caution — there are evidence obligations there that nobody meets without safety engineers and a certification body.
And it is usually
the more valuable one.
Test-bench analysis, production documentation, traceability, telemetry, parameterisation tools, approval evidence.
- Code with you
- Data with you
- No training
The founder is customer zero: master joiner, thirty years, writes no line of code.
- A specialist without IT training can lead an application without programming.
- What comes out of it survives production — for months, not for one demo.
- The evidence apparatus is real: limits, approvals, test records, a way back.
- That it runs the same way in someone else's business.
- How many hours it cost.
- How it holds up over ten years.
That is why we are looking for partners, not buyers.
There is no price on this page, but the calculation you can do yourself.
Hours saved
Two people, three hours of manual work each. At a €60 rate: €1,500 a month.
Error avoided
One mis-documented batch. One rework run.
Deadline held
An order that doesn't fail on documentation. Put your own numbers in.
What that means for the term
If it stops paying off, the partnership ends — not only when a contract runs out. Code and data sit in your accounts. What keeps you is knowledge, not a lock.
Why there is no figure here
Because without your project it would be a guess. It is set in the conversation, in writing, before the build.
Three roles, one crew
A twenty-person business cannot afford three such people.
Cody
Builds and staysBuilds, runs — and remembers why each decision went that way.
+ Cherub
The guardianChecks access rules, tenant separation and dependencies continuously. A report every month.
What Cherub checks+ Cassandra
The lookoutReports what affects you from rules, vendors and the market. Judging it is up to you.
What Cassandra watchesCancellable monthly, no minimum term. A fourth option: no tier — the application is yours. Offers apply to businesses.
Bernhard Reiter, thirty years at the workpiece, no IT training. He needed software that did not exist. In the intro call you talk to him.
- 4 April 2025
- First line of code — from someone who couldn't write one.
- 10 April 2026
- Terminal-Bench, a public test for AI systems: 89 out of 89. Confirmation still pending.
- Today
- The same tool, for your business.
Tell us where
it snags for you.
Twenty minutes, nothing to prepare. At the end we'll say one of three things: we build it with you, you can buy it ready-made, or better not at all.
You're talking to the person who builds — not to a sales rep.